Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 4ba50e7c authored by Jan Beulich's avatar Jan Beulich Committed by Juergen Gross
Browse files

xen-pciback: redo VF placement in the virtual topology


The commit referenced below was incomplete: It merely affected what
would get written to the vdev-<N> xenstore node. The guest would still
find the function at the original function number as long as
__xen_pcibk_get_pci_dev() wouldn't be in sync. The same goes for AER wrt
__xen_pcibk_get_pcifront_dev().

Undo overriding the function to zero and instead make sure that VFs at
function zero remain alone in their slot. This has the added benefit of
improving overall capacity, considering that there's only a total of 32
slots available right now (PCI segment and bus can both only ever be
zero at present).

Fixes: 8a5248fe ("xen PV passthru: assign SR-IOV virtual functions to separate virtual slots")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: default avatarBoris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8def783b-404c-3452-196d-3f3fd4d72c9e@suse.com


Signed-off-by: default avatarJuergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
parent ae897fda
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static int __xen_pcibk_add_pci_dev(struct xen_pcibk_device *pdev,
struct pci_dev *dev, int devid,
publish_pci_dev_cb publish_cb)
{
int err = 0, slot, func = -1;
int err = 0, slot, func = PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn);
struct pci_dev_entry *t, *dev_entry;
struct vpci_dev_data *vpci_dev = pdev->pci_dev_data;
......@@ -95,22 +95,25 @@ static int __xen_pcibk_add_pci_dev(struct xen_pcibk_device *pdev,
/*
* Keep multi-function devices together on the virtual PCI bus, except
* virtual functions.
* that we want to keep virtual functions at func 0 on their own. They
* aren't multi-function devices and hence their presence at func 0
* may cause guests to not scan the other functions.
*/
if (!dev->is_virtfn) {
if (!dev->is_virtfn || func) {
for (slot = 0; slot < PCI_SLOT_MAX; slot++) {
if (list_empty(&vpci_dev->dev_list[slot]))
continue;
t = list_entry(list_first(&vpci_dev->dev_list[slot]),
struct pci_dev_entry, list);
if (t->dev->is_virtfn && !PCI_FUNC(t->dev->devfn))
continue;
if (match_slot(dev, t->dev)) {
dev_info(&dev->dev, "vpci: assign to virtual slot %d func %d\n",
slot, PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn));
slot, func);
list_add_tail(&dev_entry->list,
&vpci_dev->dev_list[slot]);
func = PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn);
goto unlock;
}
}
......@@ -123,7 +126,6 @@ static int __xen_pcibk_add_pci_dev(struct xen_pcibk_device *pdev,
slot);
list_add_tail(&dev_entry->list,
&vpci_dev->dev_list[slot]);
func = dev->is_virtfn ? 0 : PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn);
goto unlock;
}
}
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment