Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Jun 25, 2021
    • Jan Kara's avatar
      blk: Fix lock inversion between ioc lock and bfqd lock · fd2ef39c
      Jan Kara authored
      
      Lockdep complains about lock inversion between ioc->lock and bfqd->lock:
      
      bfqd -> ioc:
       put_io_context+0x33/0x90 -> ioc->lock grabbed
       blk_mq_free_request+0x51/0x140
       blk_put_request+0xe/0x10
       blk_attempt_req_merge+0x1d/0x30
       elv_attempt_insert_merge+0x56/0xa0
       blk_mq_sched_try_insert_merge+0x4b/0x60
       bfq_insert_requests+0x9e/0x18c0 -> bfqd->lock grabbed
       blk_mq_sched_insert_requests+0xd6/0x2b0
       blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x154/0x280
       blk_finish_plug+0x40/0x60
       ext4_writepages+0x696/0x1320
       do_writepages+0x1c/0x80
       __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xd7/0x120
       sync_file_range+0xac/0xf0
      
      ioc->bfqd:
       bfq_exit_icq+0xa3/0xe0 -> bfqd->lock grabbed
       put_io_context_active+0x78/0xb0 -> ioc->lock grabbed
       exit_io_context+0x48/0x50
       do_exit+0x7e9/0xdd0
       do_group_exit+0x54/0xc0
      
      To avoid this inversion we change blk_mq_sched_try_insert_merge() to not
      free the merged request but rather leave that upto the caller similarly
      to blk_mq_sched_try_merge(). And in bfq_insert_requests() we make sure
      to free all the merged requests after dropping bfqd->lock.
      
      Fixes: aee69d78 ("block, bfq: introduce the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler as an extra scheduler")
      Reviewed-by: default avatarMing Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: default avatarPaolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210623093634.27879-3-jack@suse.cz
      
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      fd2ef39c
    • Jan Kara's avatar
      bfq: Remove merged request already in bfq_requests_merged() · a921c655
      Jan Kara authored
      
      Currently, bfq does very little in bfq_requests_merged() and handles all
      the request cleanup in bfq_finish_requeue_request() called from
      blk_mq_free_request(). That is currently safe only because
      blk_mq_free_request() is called shortly after bfq_requests_merged()
      while bfqd->lock is still held. However to fix a lock inversion between
      bfqd->lock and ioc->lock, we need to call blk_mq_free_request() after
      dropping bfqd->lock. That would mean that already merged request could
      be seen by other processes inside bfq queues and possibly dispatched to
      the device which is wrong. So move cleanup of the request from
      bfq_finish_requeue_request() to bfq_requests_merged().
      
      Acked-by: default avatarPaolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210623093634.27879-2-jack@suse.cz
      
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      a921c655
  2. Jun 24, 2021
  3. Jun 21, 2021
  4. Jun 18, 2021
  5. Jun 16, 2021
Loading